Search for: "In re Burwell"
Results 161 - 180
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
"And they're still not covered.Case 2: Finally, a bit of schadenfreude. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am
Commentary comes from Richard Re, who discusses the standing issue at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm
Burwell actually violates principles of constitutional federalism. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
Burwell argument is almost here! [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Burwell. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
Burwell, that is exactly what’s happening. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re weighs in on last week’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:02 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
Burwell, so it's a great time to run the odds on which justices will give ACA the axe. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
Burwell, a case that could decimate the Affordable Care Act as we know it. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case in which the Court ordered re-argument in January. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:30 am
Now, they're even failing at least one of those, which does not bode well for the average Brit.Interestingly, the good doctor is calling for a more holistic delivery approach, with services more centrally located and delivered. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Burwell, in which the Court will consider whether tax subsidies are available to individuals who purchase their health insurance on an exchange established by the federal government, continue to spur coverage and commentary. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
Burwell. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
Burwell, the challenge to the availability of tax subsidies for individuals who purchase health insurance on an exchange created by the federal government, continue. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:48 am
They’re still working — with the help of a local non-profit organization — to pay it off. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
Burwell. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 3:49 am
Burwell, it will “have a great deal of explaining to do — not to me, but to history. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
