Search for: "In re Darren T"
Results 161 - 180
of 364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
Coming up for consideration by the Court of Justice of the European Union is Case C-179/15 Daimler, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:47 am
Fellow Kat Darren did a post about this last year. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
The General Court answers this question in Joined Cases T-707/13 and T-709/13, which Valentina reports.* Green around the gills? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market is to be re-branded as the "European Union Intellectual Property Office" [for real, see Katpost here!]. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
Sheehy, ed., Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism, reviewed by Doris Buss and Jennifer KoshanRobert Leckey, ed., After Legal Equality: Family, Sex, Kinship, reviewed by Darren RosenblumSubmission Information The CJWL/RFDis Canada's oldest feminist legal periodical. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* The IPKat is again Irate - more misinformation about the Unitary Patent PackageA post from the European Commission and tweeted by the European Patent Office on the new EU patent package has ignited Darren's fuse. * Dior trade mark registration: are you being Sirous? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising [here and here are earlier katposts] might look not so attractive for the IP professions, but they are wrong, as the Nagoya-to-go-person Darren explains in this step-by-step Q&A that Jeremy enthusiastically re-launches.* The IPKat and his friends: a round-up of some IP weblog news Every three months or thereabouts, the IPKat and… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:21 pm
Don't get me wrong. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
BVBA, a decision where the General Court of the European Union addressed the issue of whether and to what extent OHIM is bound to comply with earlier res judicata decisions of national Courts.* Litigation with friends: a Scramble for Scrabble in the Court of AppealFormer guest Kat Darren Meale is back to treat us to his account of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290 [on which see the earlier Katpost here],… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 4:01 pm
If you don't already know about it, you should. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
“Plus, Ambien is totally legit to have since you’re not carrying around illicit drugs. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:54 am
But you can’t stigmatize 40 percent. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
Because they’re so trustworthy. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
That's because when you're a black guy who shoots a white law enforcement officer in self-defense, they don't write an 86-page memo with 28 footnotes about it. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
That's because when you're a black guy who shoots a white law enforcement officer in self-defense, they don't write an 86-page memo with 28 footnotes about it. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
That's because when you're a black guy who shoots a white law enforcement officer in self-defense, they don't write an 86-page memo with 28 footnotes about it. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is about a business that got a bunch of trade marks covering the somewhat unregistrable word "supreme", and then decided to bring proceedings against a defendant who wasn't using the word as a trade mark and whose use of it went back 20 years, recounts Jeremy.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on which see… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
”Wright, however, rejected that allegation, finding the lawyers weren’t in a solicitor-client relationship with the executives. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:43 am
As for disclosing the grand jury proceeding in the event of no indictment, recognizing that this would only apply to presentments involving police shootings (and, Judge, please remember that police are civilians; we’re not different species), this would seem great when the outcome is controversial, but what about cases where the cop isn’t a bad guy? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Now, Darren sinks his paws on the appeal decision in Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (6 February 2015). [read post]
