Search for: "In re Dennis B."
Results 161 - 180
of 470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm
However, Steven B. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 12:23 pm
However, Steven B. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 8:50 am
(b) No discovery will be permitted - though the parties can agree to whatever discovery they wish - at their own peril. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm
Welcome to the 2014 edition of Dennis Kennedy’s annual Best of Law-related Blogging Awards, affectionately known as the “Blawggies. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:15 am
§ 102(b). [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 9:52 am
by Dennis crouch Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
§ 102(b), the same “printed publication” language is found in post-AIA 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 9:06 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Google (Fed. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am
Dennis Crouch, Major Proposed Changes to Terminal Disclaimer Practice (and You are Not Going to Like it), Patently-O (May 9, 2024). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:48 pm
by Dennis Crouch Dynamic Drinkware v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:25 pm
Exhibit B: see above. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
Model Rule 5.4(b) limits a lawyer’s right of association. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
(b) “Will your client someday say: You’re Dead2Me? [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:16 am
by Dennis Crouch The court issued an important short-opinion, In re Ivantis, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 10:25 am
by Dennis Crouch Mylan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:32 am
by Dennis Crouch Saso Golf, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Res. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Medtronic v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm
by Dennis Crouch Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the case of In re Chestek that, on its face, simply upheld the USPTO’s requirement that trademark applicants provide their domicile address. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
§ 282(b)(2)) Eligibility Challenges: Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC v. [read post]
