Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 161 - 180
of 13,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
I'm seriously confused.Is the Court of Appeal really saying that if both sides (i.e., the defendant and the People) recognize that (1) you're obviously guilty of the offense (i.e., you did it), but (2) you're also obviously insane (i.e., could not recognize right from wrong at the time of the crime), you can't agree to that as part of a plea deal? [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
App. 2011), is another example of a party seeking recognition of a foreign judgment for defensive rather than offensive purposes, i.e., in order to defend against a claim in a US court on grounds of res judicata. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:47 am
As we watch the re-trial of the famous Bill Cosby for his sexual assault of Andrea Constand, we have to wonder why he wasn’t convicted the first time (i.e., why did the case result in a mistrial?) [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:47 am
As we watch the re-trial of the famous Bill Cosby for his sexual assault of Andrea Constand, we have to wonder why he wasn’t convicted the first time (i.e., why did the case result in a mistrial?) [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
The practice of ‘fire and rehire’ (i.e. dismissal of an employee and offering re-engagement on new, usually lesser, terms) as a way to facilitate a change to terms and conditions of employment has been under the spotlight in recent years. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:18 am
The Board cited the CAFC's decision in In re Boulevard Entertainment, Inc., 67 USPQ2d 1475 (Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
Re the controversy over nine student groups banning speakers who think Israel should exist. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
"These attacks have included certain media 'pundits' (i.e. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:46 pm
Via How Appealing, we're told that the Supreme Court in Pennsylvania has clarified that the attorney client privilege covers communications from clients to lawyers and from lawyers to client. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 2:24 pm
In re Gillespie, 197 Mich App 440, 443-446 (1992) Since a legal father who is not a party to the proceeding, (i.e., was not cited for abuse or neglect), is in priority position to receive an interim care and custody order during the proceedings, it is essential to establish his paternity / parental status and to get him included in the proceeding and to get his parental status confirmed as soon as possible. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 12:13 pm
If you're certified as a Specialist in Appellate Law by the California Board of Legal Specialization, your latest treat from the State Bar is having to deal with the Bar's "new cloud-based Admissions Information Managements System (AIMS)" which allows you to "submit recertification applications, [and] report LSCLE compliance" (i.e., Appellate Specialization MCLE). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
If you’re interested in a summary of how those went, I’d suggest taking a ... [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
Along with various new features, we’re expanding our use of experts to cover cases — i.e., to do the case preview, oral argument review, and opinion recap. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:26 am
We're back at work, which includes blogging...So for those following the Immersion v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
If you're interested, check this out: Michel Rene Barnes, "Moral Narrative and Post-Christian Catholic Theology," Modern Theology 26:4, October 2010. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:09 pm
Created by the Supreme Court in 1914 and extended to the states in 1961, the exclusionary rule requires courts to suppress (i.e., not consider or not allow a jury to consider) physical evidence [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 12:41 pm
Don’t admit to anything (i.e. drinking, driving or celebrating).Next, you’re ordered out of your vehicle and asked to perform a few police exercises, also known as field sobriety tests. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:30 pm
Last week the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) added three parties to the Entity List and imposed license requirements for exports, re-exports and in country transfers to these parties for all items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, i.e., items exported from the United States or with certain percentages of U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 5:01 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court recently decided In re Match Group, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:32 pm
We’re hiring — again! [read post]
