Search for: "In re Lower (1979)"
Results 161 - 180
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Williams, 362 N.C. 628, 669 S.E.2d 290, 294 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2008) (quoting In re Appeal of The Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
One consequence of the single-issue movements has been the re-definition of "choice" as pro-abortion. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
One consequence of the single-issue movements has been the re-definition of "choice" as pro-abortion. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:08 pm
Phifer, 297 N.C. 216 (1979), the court ruled that a search of a vehicle’s glove compartment could not be justified as a constitutionally valid inventory search. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Every factor of production is highly specialized and re-use of previously created work-product is maximized so as to maximize the economies of scale that large-scale production volumes produce. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
DeBacker, GC for the Fortune 500 company since 2000 and an employee since 1979, continues working at the company in a nonlegal capacity. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:48 pm
According to the authors, it turns out that “deep down inside narcissists think they’re awesome. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
“Only don’t tell me that you’re innocent. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:39 pm
The decision to re-up these jurisdictions in 2006 was emphatically a determination connected to 2006 information. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
” [9] Any lower court that spends time examining the Court’s post-Borak precedents would conclude that Borak’s implied derivative right of action is nonbinding dicta, as the Ninth Circuit has now done, and that private Borak suits are limited to direct claims only. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:39 am
On behalf of the lower Houses of General Synod, he sought to hold the House of Bishops to account, as an essential feature of synodical good practice. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 10:44 am
Susan deMaine 7:44 You’re welcome. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
Charest, 602 F.2d 1015, 1017 (1st Cir. 1979) (invalidating a warrant because there was "nothing in the affidavit from which a factual finding could be made that the gun used in the shooting was probably located at defendant's premises" and "[c]ommon sense tells us that it is unlikely that a murderer would hide in his own home a gun used to shoot someone").] [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
An appellate panel ruled that it will not rule on the Fourth Amendment issues arising from tapping into Internet cables even though the government admitted doing so, but will instead wait for the lower court to complete its examination of the entire case before considering an appellate review. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice, service of process, etc. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
In a ruling released yesterday afternoon by the Eighth Judicial Circuit Court in Adams County, Illinois, Judge Thomas J. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:30 am
On its surface, the case of Berle v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Aug. 13, 2004); In re Palmer, 386 A.2d 1112 (R.I. 1978) [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
* In two 3-year BJS followups of samples of felons placed on probation and of felons released from prison, rapists had a lower rate of rearrest for a new violent felony than most other categories of offenders convicted of violence. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
Mitchell, 252 Ga. 46, 311 S.E.2d 456 (1984), affirmed the lower court's order denying a mother's relocation to the United Arab Emirates on the basis that the non-Muslim father would not have rights of access to courts there and, therefore, would be unable to enforce his visitation/access rights in that country. [read post]
