Search for: "In re Marriage of Bothe"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2015, 4:29 pm
Both can and have pursued reimbursements after the victories, but the matter is seen as more significant for private local attorneys who put practices on hold and turned down other cases. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:20 am
They’re both right. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Although Michigan law prohibits both the celebration and recognition of same-sex marriage, the Michigan court reasoned that a post-marital sex change did not transform a valid heterosexual marriage into an invalid homosexual one. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
“Well, we’re ready,” Roberts replies. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Where there's a strong public policy, if you're married in another jurisdiction, that won't be accepted here. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:26 pm
The justices were very active in questioning both sides, and it's hard to tell what they're thinking, but to me it appeared that some of them, at least, were leaning toward ruling in favor of marriage equality for all California citizens. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:23 am
The significance of this decision is in the Supreme Court’s prevention of the re-opening of a case by the Rabbinical Court of Appeals that might have re-subjected the petitioner to an endless marriage as agunah with all the consequences associated with this status. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:04 pm
"The couple both suffered from deteriorating physical health over the past five years... [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:16 pm
Usually, assets acquired during the marriage belong to both the husband and wife. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:59 pm
Both Aleu and Awan testified that there was a valid cultural marriage. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
" In re T [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:08 pm
Creating a postnup can be a way to re-build trust in a marriage and establish a solid financial plan. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:06 pm
And, sadly, cases like this are both far too common as well as exceptional. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 9:48 am
“The following marriages are prohibited: a marriage entered into prior to the dissolution of an earlier marriage” 750 ILCS 5/212(a)(1) Actually, marrying someone when you’re already married to someone else is called bigamy. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
My guess is that he’ll give them the decision they want—both the big and little wins. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:55 am
In re Marriage Cases [Supreme Court of California (PDF)] California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban [AP] Calif. same-sex marriage ban struck down [CNN] Pre-Gaming the California Same-Sex Marriage Ruling [WSJ Law Blog] [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:53 pm
When you’re ending your marriage because one or both of you has cheated on the other, it’s possible that the adultery will impact the outcome of your divorce in Minnesota. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
One of the defendants, Andrew Spano, recently defeated for re-election as Westchester County Executive, issued an executive order in June 2006 directing all Westchester County agencies "to recognize same-sex marriages lawfully entered into outside the State of New York in the same manner as they currently recognize opposite sex marriages for the purposes of extending and administering all rights and benefits belonging to these couples, to the maximum extent allowed by… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
” So, we can find plenty of animus propelling these initiatives if we’re simply willing to see it. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
If you’re curious, let me tell you the story. [read post]
