Search for: "In re Oracle" Results 161 - 180 of 785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2020, 10:16 am by Chris Castle
 When it comes to the Internet Archive, we’re way past Marian but we have a whole new character in the role of grifter. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:40 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Outcomes will be collected electronically, though it is unclear whether Oracle is involved in this collection. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle America, a dispute over the copyright status of application programming interfaces. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:05 am by Kate Cox
Multiple enterprise computing companies were on the initial shortlist of potential vendors, including Oracle and IBM. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Among other things, the larger companies’ representatives will be likely to support expensive “best” practices that they can afford and other industry players can’t; and pro-regulation/anti-Section 230 technology companies with minimal UGC exposure, like IBM or Oracle, could be selected to further stack the deck against the Internet. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:21 am by Timothy B. Lee
Oracle, the owner of Java, then sued Google for copyright infringement in 2010. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle America, a dispute over the copyright status of application programming interfaces, “has the potential to force tech giant Google to finally start playing by the rules. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Supreme Court’s case Oracle v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Restatements: A Quick Reference When you’re as old as I am, you really develop a fondness for anything that you can quickly grab to remind you of all the things you’ve forgotten about stuff that any corporate lawyer should know. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Oracle America, a dispute over the copyright status of application programming interfaces, arguing that “it is time for the Supreme Court to course correct on Google’s outrageous interpretation of the ‘fair use’ doctrine under U.S. copyright law. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:06 pm by Jason Rantanen
Read Google’s brief here: Brief of Petitioner (Google) Read Oracle’s brief here: Respondent Brief (Oracle) We’re reading the Google and Oracle briefs in my Introduction to Intellectual Property class this semester as part of the concluding exercise for the unit on copyright. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:42 am by Terry Hart
‘And what’s cool about Splice Sounds is every time you’re using it, you’re putting money into the pockets of the musicians who made those sounds. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Doesn’t your approach narrow that to zero fair use, because you’re automatically providing a market/lost licensing fee? [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:19 am by Florian Mueller
Google won two district court decisions against Oracle in different years, but they were reversed by the Federal Circuit, and now the two key issues are before the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm by Chris Castle
 One reason they do not speak up is that they’re afraid of how dominant platforms could retaliate against their businesses. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:54 am by Karen Gullo
“We’re strongly urging the Supreme Court to correctly apply copyright law in this case, and put right what the Federal Circuit got wrong. [read post]