Search for: "In re S.C.R."
Results 161 - 180
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Wust, 2000 SCC 18 (CanLII), 2000 SCC 18, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, at para. 8. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:03 am
[83] The DAGC acknowledges that this duty, also known as the duty of utmost good faith or candour, applies to all of the Service’s ex parte proceedings before the Federal Court: Harkat (Re), 2010 FC 1243 at para 117, rev’d on other grounds 2012 FCA 122, appeal on reserve before the Supreme Court; Charkaoui (Re), 2004 FCA 421 at paras 153, 154; Almrei (Re), 2009 FC 1263, para 498. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:54 am
It held that it was not open to the trial judge to review whether s. 213(1)(c) breaches s. 2(b) of the Charter because that issue was decided in Reference Re ss. 193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code (Man.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1123. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
In Re Balfour Estate(1990), 85 Sask. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:46 am
We’re studying the Human Rights Code in my Employment Law course right now, so here is a straight up ‘simple’ case. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] S.C.R. 519, a case involving similar facts and legal argument in which the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the validity of the impugned provisions. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
[Control #90/012,698 – the US examiner has granted re-examination based on a “substantial new question of patentability. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Pan, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 344, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the jury secrecy provisions in section 649. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
., 2002 SCC 34 (CanLII), 2002 SCC 34, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 336, at paras. 30-31. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:14 am
Honsberger [1974] S.C.R. 239 (S.C.C.) and Laface v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In fact, they’re aided in their Bronson-esque investigative methods by a legal system that essentially puts suspects at their mercy. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
Accordingly, a restitution order does not operate as res judicata to the institution of civil proceedings for incurred damages. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 4:40 pm
Major, [1930] S.C.R. 252 (S.C.C.) [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Baldwin International Radio of Canada, [1934] S.C.R. 570 at p. 574). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Elliott, “References, Structural Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada’s Constitution” (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 5:32 pm
Constitution Insurance Co. of Canada., 1987 CanLII 75 (SCC), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 2. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
The King, [1951] S.C.R. 504, at p. 515. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
Kathy K (The), [1976] 2 S.C.R. 802; Housen v. [read post]
