Search for: "In re S.E" Results 161 - 180 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am by Jonathan Holbrook
If they’re not statements, then what are they? [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
It should if you’re familiar with the Zelouf case previously featured on this blog. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:26 am by Jacquelyn Greene
Both K.C. and  In re J.M.C., 793 S.E.2d 285 (November 15, 2016) were remanded in part because reports that were referenced were not provided to the court on appeal. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 8:03 am by Gregory Forman
  Given the civility oath and In re Golden, 329 S.C. 335, 496 S.E.2d 619 (1998), I’d be surprised if this happens again in my career. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 3:34 pm by Mack Sperling
¶32 (quoting In re Will of Buck, 350 N.C. 621, 626, 516 S.E.2d 858, 861 (1999)). [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 8:29 am by Jonathan Holbrook
We’re told that citing to them is “disfavored,” so are they good law or not? [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:56 am by Jeff Welty
. __, 793 S.E.2d 287 (2016), and held that any “any criminal pleading that establishes jurisdiction in the district court should toll the two-year statute of limitations” set forth in G.S. 15-1. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:00 am by ilpc
App. at 524, 742 S.E.2d at 634; In re C.P., 181 N.C. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:01 am by Jeff Welty
App. __, 809 S.E.2d 213 (2017) (emphasizing that applications must be supported by affidavits and filed as special proceedings). [read post]