Search for: "In re Sherman" Results 161 - 180 of 1,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 3:33 pm by Cory Doctorow
But this is an opportunity, and we’re delighted to seize it. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:02 am by Deb Givens
  In Re: Humira (Adalimumab) Antitrust Litigation, concerns Humira, a biologic therapy developed and marketed by AbbVie to treat rheumatoid arthritis. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a Brookings Institution report, Carl Romer, Andre M. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 11:02 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
The committee will hear the testimony of Wendy Sherman, deputy secretary of state; Richard Visek, acting legal adviser for the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Justices Middleton, Jagot and Moshinsky identified three errors of principle in Justice Perram’s evaluation of ‘strong reasons’, enabling them to re-evaluate whether strong reasons existed. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 9:12 pm by Andrew Coopersmith
In announcing his executive order, President Biden made it clear he was seeking to change the rules by which the U.S. economy operates: “We’re now 40 years into the experiment of letting giant corporations accumulate more and more power. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Huy-Quang Nguyen, 2021 QCCDPHA 31 (CanLII) [147] Quant au premier volet du test de l’arrêt Sherman[55], le Conseil estime que la protection des droits à la protection contre l’auto-incrimination, au silence et à une défense pleine entière invoqués par l’intimé constitue, sans équivoque, un intérêt public important. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent working paper, Tara M. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:09 pm by Bona Law PC
Both the FTC and AG suits claimed that Facebook’s actions amounted to illegal monopolization in violation of Sherman Act Section 2. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:58 pm by Mitch Stoltz
But we’re worried about the limitations of today’s antitrust law, as shown by yesterday’s decision. [read post]
The subcommittee will hear testimony from John Sherman, acting chief information officer of the Defense Department. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:00 pm by Bona Law PC
Supreme Court affirmed lower court decisions and held that certain NCAA restrictions on educational benefits for student-athletes violated Sherman Act Section 1. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) issues and enforces these rules, which re- strict compensation for student-athletes in various ways. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am by Ilya Somin
The NCAA does not contest that its re­straints affect interstate trade and commerce and are thus subject to the Sherman Act. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Moreover, in In re Sherman, 491 F. 3d 948 (9th Cir. 2007) — a post-BAPCPA enactment case — the Ninth Circuit again appeared to reject bad faith as a cause for dismissal under § 707(a). [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by Jay L. Levine and Carrie Garrison
They seek to do away with consumer welfare as an antitrust standard and re-establish other political considerations as a legitimate objective for the antitrust laws. [read post]
14 May 2021, 3:06 am by Liz Dunshee
Richard Massony of Hunton Andrews Kurth, Andrew Sherman of Seyfarth Shaw and Bela Zaslavsky of K&L Gates discussed: 1. [read post]
8 May 2021, 11:46 am by Bona Law PC
Moreover, not only is it easy to argue that the PGA Tour is a monopoly whose conduct might implicate Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, but the PGA Tour also has relationships with other entities that could implicate Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which bars anticompetitive agreements. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:28 am by Florian Mueller
Not every long story is neverending: this summer we're finally going to know whether Apple and Intel's antitrust complaint against Fortress Investment in the Norther District of California over abusive patent aggregation will be taken to trial--or whether the plaintiffs have to appeal a dismissal with prejudice. [read post]