Search for: "In re Starr" Results 161 - 180 of 417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:39 am by Stephen Z. Starr
For all the hundreds of clients that Starr & Starr, PLLC has successfully represented in personal bankruptcy cases over the years, please be aware that you have nothing to worry about. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:39 am by Stephen Z. Starr
For all the hundreds of clients that Starr & Starr, PLLC has successfully represented in personal bankruptcy cases over the years, please be aware that you have nothing to worry about. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Sedor
Starr said the check was only for four dollars, “but it’s just the principle of the thing. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
You expect strangers in a strange town to ask strangers about dead bodies in a house they're looking to buy? [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 6:48 am by Jack Sharman
 Mini we’re not mindfully weighing the expected benefits against the expected costs. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:19 am
In re I.Am Symbolic, LLC, Appeals Nos. 2016-1507, 2016-1508, 2015-1509 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am by Scott Bomboy
According to the memo, written by Kenneth Starr during the Clinton impeachment investigation, a law professor assigned by Starr to research the question concluded President Bill Clinton could face criminal charges while in office. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
His antics at the outset of the Lewinsky investigation helped ensure that Lewinsky did not secure a quick immunity deal with Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr. [read post]
It is also worth noting that the office into which Mueller steps is different from the office occupied by independent counsels like Kenneth Starr and Lawrence Walsh. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
Circuit Judge Kenneth Starr referred to as “Judge” while acting as the Special Prosecutor investigating President Clinton? [read post]
9 May 2017, 8:09 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Susan Hennessey
By the time you listen to this, it may be out of date, but we're confident it's the best discussion you'll hear on the subject tonight. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (While the opinion notes the trial court rejected Respondents’ and Real Parties’ “various procedural defenses” – which were not specified in the opinion, but which in fact included statute of limitations, mootness, and res judicata/collateral estoppel – the Court of Appeal expressly declined to reach these issues, stating in a footnote:  “We need not address the Ohlsons’ various procedural defenses because we affirm the trial… [read post]