Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Criminal Practice" Results 161 - 180 of 740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The farm is located more than 30 miles from his campaign committee. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by fjhinojosa
Loewy, It’s debatable: Should Supreme Court Vacancy Not be Filled Until After Election? [read post]
The Arizona Supreme Court found that the presence of such conduct was not sufficient to contest the election. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
A civil lawsuit was hardly a practical compliance mechanism that has now suddenly, with the court’s most recent decision, been made ineffectual. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:30 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
In July of this year, Brazil’s Supreme Court ordered the Ministry of Justice to halt SEOPI’s intelligence-gathering against political opponents. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm by James Romoser
In a nearly 12-hour question-and-answer session with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Barrett followed the practice of other nominees in the last two decades and refused to comment on any pending Supreme Court case, assess the merits of any past Supreme Court decision, or entertain hypotheticals about any issue that could conceivably end up before the justices. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am by Andrew Delaney
For those that don’t practice criminal law, Rule 11 (not the civil rule 11) requires a number of things. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 7:17 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
  According to the official commentary, it is intended to be guidance for judges engaging in cross-border cases for the foreseeable future, and appears to further develop the principles related to cross-border issues in the Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Thoroughly Implementing the Spirit of the Fourth Plenum of the 19th Party Congress to Advance the Modernization of the Judicial System and Judicial Capacity. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court, is “Delaware’s courts are widely regarded as the least partisan and most professional in the nation. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Pollman
Ritter, the Delaware Supreme Court validated the original Caremark dicta and situated it in the growing body of good faith case law. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:33 am by Ronald Newman
Voters will hear Donald Trump and Joe Biden talk about their views on the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy, and the Supreme Court vacancy created by the untimely passing of ACLU alumna Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As Democrats and voting rights advocates seek to lower barriers to voting during the pandemic, the Supreme Court has largely deferred to local and state officials, showing a reluctance to upend rules close to the election. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:57 pm by Anna Salvatore
Justice Jackson was one of only a handful of, I think three, maybe, attorneys general who ultimately ended up as a justice on the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
After getting outspent in 2016, Trump filed for re-election on the day of his inauguration betting the head start would deliver him a decisive financial advantage this year. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
This law included many provisions that interfered with human rights, so much so that the Mexican National Commission for Human Rights has filed a constitutional challenge before the Supreme Court seeking to annul these amendments. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These lawsuits also allege that the boards misled investors about their companies’ diversity and inclusion practices. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” In 2016, the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs reached a similar conclusion regarding court delays affecting access to the criminal justice system. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Judicial immunity and legislative immunity shield the Supreme Court of Kentucky and Character and Fitness Committee from damages. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While the president and vice president are exempt from the civil provisions of the law, they are subject to two criminal provisions derived from the Hatch Act, said Kathleen Clark, a legal and government ethics professor at Washington University. [read post]