Search for: "In the Interest of CCC"
Results 161 - 180
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
But as with CCC before them, the new licenses don’t change the fundamental policy and normative bases for fair use. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:52 am
” By which the CCC apparently means, fair use dies.)Creative Commons: CC licenses don’t interfere with fair use, and licensing can’t substitute for fair use. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
What the senator ignored in Grutter was the court’s admonition: “We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the the interest [in obtaining the educational benefits that flows from a diverse student body] approved today.” [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
What the senator ignored in Grutter was the court’s admonition: “We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the the interest [in obtaining the educational benefits that flows from a diverse student body] approved today. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am
Comment If this claim reaches trial, the Court will have to grapple with competing privacy and public interest arguments, whilst side-stepping a wider moral debate. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am
Across the country, judges are—sometimes on their own initiative, when a defendant doesn’t—requiring plaintiffs to prove a real ownership interest. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 7:50 am
But it does appear that the Affair continues to present interesting problems for resolution. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:34 pm
In most cases it is zero because very few universities purchase blanket licenses from the CCC. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Last week I had the privilege of addressing the Dallas Bar IP Section on the subject of the current controversy over copyright and prior art submissions in patent prosecution. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
" CCC Info. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:34 pm
AFG / Supervalu E. coli Outbreak Lawsuits - Minnesota (2000) AgVenture Farms Petting Zoo E. coli O157:H7 Outbreak Lawsuits - Florida (2005) Aunt Mid’s Lettuce E. coli Outbreak Lawsuits - Michigan, Illinois, and Ontario (2008) Bauer Meat E. coli Litigation - Georgia (1998) Baugher’s Apple Cider E. coli Outbreak Lawsuit - Maryland (2010) Big Fresno Fair E. coli Outbreak Lawsuit - California (2005) BJ’s Wholesale Club E. coli Litigation - New York and New… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:43 am
§6-1-105 (1)(a) through (ccc) offers over forty examples of what may constitute a deceptive trade practice. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:19 pm
The Class A-1 Notes were priced at 700 bps over benchmark interest rate swaps and will have ratings of Aaa and aaa by Moody's and A.M. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 11:20 am
If you or a family member became ill with an E. coli infection or HUS after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark E. coli attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
12 May 2012, 3:03 am
The second point I think is interesting is the fact that Judge Evan considered hit counts when making determinations about some of the disputed excerpts. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
Although the CCC is touted to the courts as a uniform licensing solution, libraries that use it, and even those few who use its blanket license, know that it is far from uniform. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
I've a soft spot in my heart for the CCC and that might produce some actual long-term environmental good, so why not let's pay college-age kids to plant trees instead of going to school again! [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 3:20 pm
If you or a family member became ill with an E. coli infection or HUS after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark E. coli attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:47 pm
When he produces some evidence that publishers have any interest in serving this market, I'll re-think my position that Lichtman is an apostle for pure deadweight loss. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:44 am
This is not about protecting authors; it is, as it always has been, a marketing ploy, especially for the CCC, that aims to compel libraries to give an even larger share of their budgets to these publishers, and the groups that are financing them, without getting any new scholarship for that money. [read post]
