Search for: "In the Matter of Decker" Results 161 - 180 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 10:53 am by Steve Kalar
The strength of Judge Hawkin’s opinion may matter: our colleague Davina may be a reluctant white-quill recipient before the dust settles on the case.How to Use: Doss isn’t limited to the marital privilege. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:52 pm by Michael Markarian
The 111th Congress turned out to be a very productive session that ushered in several major policy reforms for animal welfare that were top priorities for HSUS and HSLF. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
W.D. 2010).After the trial court’s ruling in this case, the Missouri Supreme Court made it clear that the Workers’ Compensation Law’s exclusivity defense is not a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, but rather constitutes an affirmative defense. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:24 am by admin
  The next time you buy or sell a house – or for that matter, the next time you’re checking out your title deed – take a good look at the property’s boundary. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:27 pm by D. Kappos
  Our participating applications were accelerated by more than a year and examined by responsive, cooperative examiners who were willing to work with us to define patentable subject matter in an expedient manner. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today, we have a post on another regulatory body also developing an opinion on social media as Christian Moffitt writes on the FDA's growing interest in the matter. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:58 am by Daniel E. Cummins
R.C.P. 1006.I have secured a copy of the Judge's Rule 1925 Opinion issued in this matter now that the case is going up on appeal.The plaintiff involved in this matter was from Northumberland County. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
  At ACSblog, Annie Decker reviews the oral argument in Williamson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The plaintiff involved in this matter was from Northumberland County. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Other judges, from York and Adams counties, have followed suit.The main rationale put forth in those severance decisions is primarily that evidence of "insurance" is not admissible in personal injury civil litigation matters under Pa.R.E. 411. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Although it's not officially an IP journal, the subject matter dictates that it will inevitably touch on IP topics. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  When Black & Decker took this position publicly, the NYSE intervened and Black & Decker issued a correcting press release. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
The cost of developing the project is expected to be more than $200 million, according to people familiar with the matter. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:25 am by Woodrow Pollack
Following up on yesterday's post on false marking, I learned today via Docket Navigator that at least one Court rejected a false patent marking defendant's argument that, as a matter of pleading, affixing an expired patent number to a product could not be actionable. [read post]