Search for: "In the Matter of J.P."
Results 161 - 180
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 4:31 am
From March 2009 until Decmeber 2009 Silato was associated with J.P. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 6:40 am
Gill’s second firm termination in October 2013 was due to allegation by J.P. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Dist.], 227 AD3d 1435, 1436 [4th Dept 2024]; see Matter of Asset Protection & Sec. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Dist.], 227 AD3d 1435, 1436 [4th Dept 2024]; see Matter of Asset Protection & Sec. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Accordingly, we remit this matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a determination of the amount of an award of reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs to the petitioner.BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, GENOVESI and VENTURA, JJ., concur.ENTER:Darrell M. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Accordingly, we remit this matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a determination of the amount of an award of reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs to the petitioner.BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, GENOVESI and VENTURA, JJ., concur.ENTER:Darrell M. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Decided and Entered: June 28, 2022 Before: Gische, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Singh, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Decided and Entered: June 28, 2022 Before: Gische, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Singh, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Matter of Croghan v Adams2025 NY Slip Op 01285Decided on March 06, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: March 06, 2025Before: Kern, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.Index No. 157449/22|Appeal No. 3823|Case No. 2024-00714|[*1]In the Matter… [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Matter of Croghan v Adams2025 NY Slip Op 01285Decided on March 06, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: March 06, 2025Before: Kern, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.Index No. 157449/22|Appeal No. 3823|Case No. 2024-00714|[*1]In the Matter… [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
But this isn't a sex crimes case, and for lots of the victims here, I'm not sure it really matters if they're named. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
& Community Supervision--Commissioner of Labor) 2023 NY Slip Op 06424 Decided on December 14, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Egan Jr., J.P. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
& Community Supervision--Commissioner of Labor) 2023 NY Slip Op 06424 Decided on December 14, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Egan Jr., J.P. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
Klein (Klein) and J.P. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Decided and Entered: March 21, 2023 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Decided and Entered: March 21, 2023 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Board rationally found, under the second prong, that there was no "reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute and the general subject matter of the CBA" (Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, 283 [2010][citation omitted]).We reject petitioner's argument that its members who failed to comply with the citywide vaccine mandate were deprived of rights under the regulations of respondent… [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Board rationally found, under the second prong, that there was no "reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute and the general subject matter of the CBA" (Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, 283 [2010][citation omitted]).We reject petitioner's argument that its members who failed to comply with the citywide vaccine mandate were deprived of rights under the regulations of respondent… [read post]