Search for: "In the Matter of Robert T. Thompson" Results 161 - 180 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am by Kevin O'Keefe
Diversity & Community Involvement This isn't a traditional legal blog; instead, it highlights Allen Matkins' diversity efforts and ongoing involvement in the community. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
December 1, 2019New Website for LawyersTrial of a New York Matrimonial and Custody Action (www.nysdivorce.net)  deals with the trial of a New York matrimonial and custody action. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 am by Anushka Limaye
Thompson, and Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy David J. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am by Sang-Min Kim
Our prosecutors are looking at those and I can’t say anything more about ongoing investigations. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Thompson, 947 F.2d 666, 676 (3d Cir. 1991) (so holding as a First Amendment matter, but concluding that Pennsylvan [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
  Nathan Dane’s influential 1823 General Abridgment and Digest of American Law similarly treated the Bill of Rights as providing that “the jury in criminal matters must be unanimous. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I have just posted a preliminary draft of an article that is currently entitled The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View from International Law and Standards. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am by David Post
Incidentally, those of you who disagree with my contention that the Court is in the process of completely dismantling the standing requirement in federal courts should take a look at the colloquy between Justices Roberts and Kagan in the student loan case, Biden v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:29 am by William Ford, Christiana Wayne
David Thompson, vice chief of staff of space operations. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Montana:  Family Law Matters by Corbin Howard, Esq. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Most states have a constitutional or statutory provision announcing that courts shall be public and open with the exception of particularly sensitive proceedings, such as those involving sexual abuse or certain domestic matters, for example, which may be closed to the public upon the court's discretion. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:45 am by INFORRM
When questioned on this by Robert Jay QC, inquiry counsel, Fedorcio said he often dealt with requests from the paper on a Saturday afternoon, including an article on the alleged Victoria Beckham kidnap plot, which had been shrouded in secrecy by journalists to keep it away from competitors. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
This coming Thursday afternoon, October 16, 2014, at the third annual LLC Institute held in Arlington, Virginia, I’ll be on a panel along with Professor Eric Chiappinelli (Texas Tech University School of Law), Professor Benjamin Means (University of South Carolina School of Law), Professor Douglas Moll (University of Houston Law Center), and Professor Robert Thompson (Georgetown Law) for a program called Family Business Disputes. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Now it seems to me that there is no First Amendment exception for speech that the judge views as being "born out of a vendetta," or even as "seeking to cause mental distress"; but even to the extent there are exceptions for, say, defamation, or true threats, or perhaps even speech on matters of private concern that's "extreme and outrageous" and intended to cause severe emotional distress, that can't justify an overbroad, categorical… [read post]