Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. B., Child"
Results 161 - 180
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
” On the other hand, Family Code section 3100(a) allows for courts to make orders granting “reasonable visitation” rights “to any other person having an interest in the welfare of the child. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:54 pm
To the extent that some courts have determined that section 260.10 (1) requires that a defendant's conduct must be directly focused upon the child, or that evidence of a child witnessing a severe act of violence is insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction under this statute, those decisions are not to be followed (see, People v Carr, 208 AD2d 855, appeal after new trial 229 AD2d 446, lv denied 88 NY2d 1067; People v Suarez, 133 Misc 2d 762). [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:15 am
Adam B. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
Penal Law § 260.10 (1) provides that a person endangers the welfare of a child when "[h]e knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Haydel’s proprietor testified that “[b]ead dog, beaded dog, a dog made of beads are all common terms for describing” a dog made from Mardi Gras-style beads. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
It doesn't matter whether or not that custodial parent has sole or joint custody of the child. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am
Don’t make the mistake of assuming that an Australian court order will necessarily be respected by an overseas country. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 1:59 pm
Child pornography is one. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:37 pm
The consultation proposal is to drop Group B entirely, with an adjustment to Group A. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
” B. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:05 pm
More Re B-S and less BS. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
IV, § 28-92 (defining “sexual orientation” as “[t]he status of an individual as to his or her heterosexuality, homosexuality or bisexuality”). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
I don’t see how A (A Child) and Y(Children) can sit together. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
That case follows hot on the heels of Re B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 33. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:58 am
Wiggins in Livingston County relying upon Matter of Wallman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
But they aren’t in the bible. [read post]
