Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. R., Mother" Results 161 - 180 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
They were all acting with their mother as their litigation friend. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
The mother testified as to these matters during the custody trial, such that the issues and her position thereon were before the Family Court. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:00 am by Michelle O'Neil
Supreme Court has consistently held that people have the primary right to raise children in accordance with their wishes and that government interference in family matters will be subject to the highest scrutiny. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Firstly, it was not the case that Lambeth 'probably' should have referred TG to Children's Services 'as a matter of good practice'. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Firstly, it was not the case that Lambeth 'probably' should have referred TG to Children's Services 'as a matter of good practice'. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm by familoo
Hemmings is well known in the family law world as a vocal critic of the family justice system, it’s secrecy and it’s role in the removal of children from their families. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
Brian and Princess had two children together, Brian McCurdy, Jr., who was 18 years old and resided with his mother in Southfield, Michigan; and B.M., who was born in 2004 and was six years old. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
" "You're not really going to raise children in the city are you? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
This very humble and capable judge lead the most difficult insurance quagmire into a fair resolution, as I indicated in a post that I want you to read twice--once in the entirety and second for the bold emphasis if you want to understand how I felt about the matter-- I noted in a post from two years ago, A Judge That Gets It: It is very, very hard to be a good judge. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:50 am by familoo
He does go so far as to suggest that the children of separated parents “should have a reasonable degree of contact with both their mother and father”. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Eugene Volokh
’”When applying the best interests standard to decide a parenting rights and responsibilities matter, the trial court may consider a parent’s religious training of his or her child solely in relation to the welfare of the child. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court has consistently held that people have a fundamental right to raise children in accordance with their wishes and that government intervention in family matters will be afforded the highest scrutiny. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Oklahoma in its code and in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[28] and South Dakota in the case of Matter of Adoption of Baade[29]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Here we have a child who has never resided in an Indian family, and who has a non-Indian mother” and because the child was not a member of an existing Indian family, the father lacked standing to ask the court to apply ICWA.[34]  The case of Baby Boy D has a dissenting opinion in which the dissenting justice states that the majority has misconstrued ICWA in holding that ICWA may be disregarded if the child has not been living in an Indian familial setting.[35] … [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Adam Thierer
Wow, what a year for cyberlaw and information technology policy books! [read post]