Search for: "Interest of L.J."
Results 161 - 180
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to States’ interests in immigration enforcement. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:22 am
L.J. 59, 60 (2013). [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
In the interests of full disclosure: I authored an amicus brief in this case (as I did in the other Flo & Eddie cases) on behalf of 15 copyright and intellectual property law professors, arguing three major points: first, because the phrase “exclusive ownership” in the statute dated back to its enactment in 1872, it should be construed in accordance with the copyright law of that time, when sound recordings did not exist and musical work copyright owners did not have any… [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Copyright law has public interest goals. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 10:10 am
Harrison, supra note 88, at 122 (citing Derrick Bell, Application of the "Tipping Point" Principle to Law Faculty Hiring Policies, 10 Nova L.J. 319 (1986)). 102. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Importantly, the Terms: (1) purport to bind any entity that has an ownership interest in the goods; and (2) include a forum selection provision selecting the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 11:20 am
Blattmachr (Peak Trust Company), Estate Planning for Cannabis Business Owners: An Introduction, 41 ACTEC L.J. ___ (2022): As more states legalize cannabis sales, estate planners may increasingly be called upon to advise clients with interests in cannabis-related businesses. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
.'" Ilan Wurman, Nondelegation at the Founding, 130 Yale L.J. 1490, 1506 (2021). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 4:05 am
Postema (Hart Publishing, 2020)).Marc Spindelman, Justice Gorsuch's Choice: From Bostock to Dobbs (What a Blockbuster LGBT Rights Ruling Might Mean for the Future of Abortion Rights), (Nat'l L.J. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Freedom of the press from governmental interference under the First Amendment does not sanction repression of that freedom by private interests.[124] The Court held this with regard to the Associated Press, an alliance of newspapers, but its rationale would also apply to one mega-company as well. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
They haven't, for instance, visibly tried to deploy their power in a way to block legislation that would specifically harm their business interests. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Nevertheless, at least for advancing the normative order at the heart of the interests of the United States and its post global imperium, this is a positive development. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:30 am
L.J. 1091 (2020). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
(In the interests of full disclosure, I should note that I was one of 65 intellectual property scholars that signed an amicus brief in favor of Google in this case.) [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 10:00 am
L.J. 119, 120 (1982). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
It is the court’s job to protect the public interest, and this order abdicates that duty. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:07 pm
Lande, Using the “Consumer Choice” Approach to Antitrust Law, 74 ANTITRUST L.J. 175, 184 (2007). [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 12:10 pm
Those interested in my qualms about the process and its unintended perverse effects may consider them at See Larry Catá Backer, "Moving Forward the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights: Between Enterprise Social Norm, State Domestic Legal Orders, and the Treaty Law That Might Bind Them All," Fordham Int'l L.J. 38:457 (2015). [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
L.J. 437 (2019). [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
" FN195 FN195: Katherine Shaw, Impeachable Speech, 70 Emory L.J. at 62: My view about impeachment and the First Amendment is not new. [read post]
