Search for: "It's My Party, Inc. v. Live Nation, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 185–86 (5th Cir. 1981) (permitting plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously because the lawsuit revealed their unpopular personal beliefs); Choice, Inc. of Tex. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
This is the question posed by the IPKat in July of last year, which was also before the Chancery Division England and Wales, in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: suppose I want to give a phone to my cousin. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
And, more importantly than a Website, while she was looking up Mandelman Inc. to find its status listed as “suspended,” I’m assuming she noticed that The 4th Floor LLC, wasn’t. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
As described by my second post, the next step involves the Commission sitting down with the parties to encourage a settlement. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:27 am
Beacon Journal Publishing Co., Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has concluded its investigation into Snap, Inc’s launch of the ‘My AI’ chatbot. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The European Data Protection Board has issued its Annual Report 2020: Ensuring data protection rights in a changing world The Hawktalk blog has a post “Missing data protection safeguards with respect to NHS Digital’s national database of medical records“. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
I base this inference on my knowledge of the proceedings of President Biden's Supreme Court Reform Commission, since Biden's July 29th op-ed and speech provided no specifics. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The parties will also reimburse EPA $200,000 for its site investigation costs, and pay EPA for all of its costs to oversee the soil removal work. [read post]