Search for: "Ives, A. v. Ives, K."
Results 161 - 180
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 8:39 am
Loch K. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 3:42 am
Stone IV. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
In response, all three companies filed an amendment on Form 10-K/A, adding Item 1C disclosure. [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:27 am
Counts I and V allege that A.B. used a computer network to transmit the following: `hey you piece of greencastle s* *t. what the f* *k do you think of me know (sic) that you cant [sic] control me? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
The contrasting markings therefore did not contribute to the solution of any technical problem by providing a technical effect and hence had no significance when assessing inventive step (Summary of facts and submissions, points V and VII). [4.2.2] The present board is aware of the difficulty of assessing whether or not a feature contributes to the technical character of a claim. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 4:01 pm
The Guidelines for examination in the EPO (D-V 3.3) contain the statement that “if information is made available by means of a written description and use or by means of a written and oral description, but only the use or the oral description is made available before the relevant date, then in accordance with C-IV, 6.1, the subsequently published written description may be deemed to give a true account of that oral description or use, unless the proprietor of the patent can… [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:07 am
“K” [November 20, 2015, Order]). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
”IV. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:36 am
Mr K’s application to the Upper Tribunal to appeal was refused. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
Kucera, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Susan K. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
During the Company's two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and through March 23, 2009, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted Grant Thornton LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Grant Thornton LLP concluded… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 pm
PART I: INTRODUCTION 1: J Cohen & L Deliens: Applying a public health perspective in end-of-life care PART II: CLINICAL AND SOCIAL CONTEXT OF DEATH AND DYING 2: ST Tang & C-H Chen: Place of death and end-of-life care 3: I Higginson: Circumstances of death and dying 4: A Van der Heide & J Rietjens: End-of-life decisions 5: K Fassbender: Economic and health related consequences of individuals caring for terminally ill cancer patients in Canada PART III: END-OF-LIFE… [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
In Sims v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
k. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
” See 2 K. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:25 pm
By Larry K. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
IV. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
IV). [read post]
