Search for: "J B
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 161 - 180
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
SUPPLEMENTAL EARNINGS CLAIMS 18 V. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
B. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:23 pm
Carefirst of Fort Wayne Inc., d/b/a/ Advanced Healthcare, 13 months after Stephen J. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
J. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
United States; Zephier v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Mark J. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
”); Michael J. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Vázquez (Georgetown), Ingrid B. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
The last was Matthew Wrinkles on December 11 in Indiana. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
§2307.71(B), which states that OPLA is "intended to abrogate all common law product liability claims or causes of action. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Clark v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:59 pm
§ 2B1.1(b)(2); United States v. [read post]
