Search for: "J. A. Nicklin "
Results 161 - 180
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 21-23 and 26 April 2021 (Nicklin J) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 10 to 12 May 2021 the trial in the case of Riley v Murray took place before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
As already mentioned, on 6 May 2021 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
Citing long-standing principles distilled in Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB) [2020] [16] by Nicklin J, Warby LJ confirmed that the concept of bare comment is an aspect of the first condition of the honest opinion defence, which requires that ‘the statement complained of was a statement of opinion’ (s 3(2) of the Defamation Act 2013). [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 26 April 2021, Nicklin J heard the last day of the Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm
Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 1 to 5 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
Abramovich v Harper Collins, issued on 22 March 2021 Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 March 2021 Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
On the same day, Nicklin J handed down judgment in Ward v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 641 (QB). [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 8 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of COS v PER. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 1 March 2021 Nicklin J heard closing submissions in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 22 and 24 February 2021 Nicklin J heard the libel trial in the case of Lachaux v Evening Standard and Independent Print. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 17 February 2021 Saini J heard an application in the case of Weaver v British Airways. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
On 10 February 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BHX v GRX Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Ogbonna v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 3 February 2021 Nicklin J gave a costs judgment in the case of Santi v Santi. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
On 29 January 2021, Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Haviland v The Andrew Lownie Literary Agency Ltd. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
On 22 January 2021 there was an application in the case of Prokhorova v Pfister & ors before Nicklin J. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
On Tuesday and Wednesday 19 and 20 January 2021 Warby J will hear the Duchess of Sussex’s application for summary judgment against Associated Newspapers, the publishers of the Mail on Sunday, in her claim for misuse of private information, data protection and breach of copyright. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
Nicklin J also heard an application in Ward v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm
Third, that the Court of Appeal was wrong to uphold the findings of Nicklin J that the the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to the published information complained of, and that the Article 8/10 balancing exercise came down in his favour. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
On 10 December 2020 a unilateral Statement in Open Court was read before Nicklin J, after Sir James and Lady Deirdre Dyson accepted an offer of amends in relation to false and defamatory claims made by the Daily Mail in an article published in 2019 as it reported on a legal dispute between the Dysons and their former housekeeper. [read post]
