Search for: "J. Hale" Results 161 - 180 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
The Supreme Court appeal was heard by a panel of five Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:52 am by INFORRM
Holyoake v Candy, heard 13 and 14 December 2016 (Warby J). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 4-3 majority (Hale, Kerr and Phillips dissenting). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:56 am
Banwell was published, although strangely the list also refers to this as the third edition.A sixth edition by the same authors was published in 1960 (not sure what happened to the intervening editions) and a seventh in 1967, by Banwell and J. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:15 pm by Alfred Brophy
 In the Shadow of the Gallows reads classics by J. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:15 am by David Ingram
They included two nominees for the Southern District of New York: J. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
  However, Linden J noted that they also agreed with Lady Hale, who gave the leading judgment), in which “… it was implicit … that reasonable delay in finding alternative accommodation would only be permissible if the accommodation was regarded as suitable for the time being, and that the housing authority would otherwise be in breach of its duty under section 193(2)”. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
  However, Linden J noted that they also agreed with Lady Hale, who gave the leading judgment), in which “… it was implicit … that reasonable delay in finding alternative accommodation would only be permissible if the accommodation was regarded as suitable for the time being, and that the housing authority would otherwise be in breach of its duty under section 193(2)”. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Giles Peaker
In her dissenting judgement in R (N) v Lewisham, Baroness Hale expressed puzzlement that that appeared to be the generally accepted view. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
Foskett J in the High Court had originally decided that none of the claims were time-barred; that five of the 10 had not acquired the requisite knowledge until less than three years before issue of their claim, and that the other five should in any event be allowed to proceed under s 33. [read post]