Search for: "Jackson v. Russell" Results 161 - 180 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
Tom Goldstein, the publisher of SCOTUSblog and partner at Goldstein & Russell, P.C., has argued more than 40 cases before the Supreme Court since his first oral argument in 1999. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 9:51 pm by Simon Gibbs
I referred the judge to paragraphs 113-116 and 223 of Hollins v Russell [2003] EWCA Civ. 718). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm by WSLL
Lance, Assistant Attorney GeneralRepresenting Appellee Russell Nomura: David M. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:25 pm
 In awarding the Plaintiff $19,000 for his non-pecuniary loss as a result of soft tissue injuries Madam Justice Russell summarized the law of non-pecuniary damages as follows: [32]                        The purpose of non-pecuniary damage awards is to compensate the plaintiff for "pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and loss… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 6:07 am
 In doing so Madam Justice Russell summarized the law of non-pecuniary damages ar paragraphs 104-105 of the judgment as follows: Non-pecuniary damages [104]                The purpose of non-pecuniary damage awards is to compensate the plaintiff for "pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and loss of amenities":  Jackson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Ontario family law firm Russell Alexander was pleased to announce that law student Amelia Rodin won the firm’s Client Service Award, and blogged about the recent decision in Jackson v Mayerle, resulting from a 36-day child custody trial, and what the trial circumstances say about the parents. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:47 am by Jon Hyman
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Ontario family law firm Russell Alexander was pleased to announce that law student Amelia Rodin won the firm’s Client Service Award, and blogged about the recent decision in Jackson v Mayerle, resulting from a 36-day child custody trial, and what the trial circumstances say about the parents. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Ontario family law firm Russell Alexander was pleased to announce that law student Amelia Rodin won the firm’s Client Service Award, and blogged about the recent decision in Jackson v Mayerle, resulting from a 36-day child custody trial, and what the trial circumstances say about the parents. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]