Search for: "Jacobs v Grant"
Results 161 - 180
of 815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
NY Appellate Court Holds Zoning Board’s Interpretation of Zoning Code is Irrational and Unreasonable
8 Dec 2023, 9:52 am
This post was authored by Patrick Faivre, Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 pm
Silverman v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
The decision in the case, Islestarr Holdings Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd [2019] EWHC 1473 (Ch) dismissed Aldi’s argument that the ephemerality of the powder design meant that it was not sufficiently fixed to be granted copyright protection. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Jacobs of Greenwire previews next month’s oral argument in Marvin M. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:29 am
But that is not how the Court of Appeals (Sack, Nathan and Jacobs) sees it, and it affirms the grant of summary judgment. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Jacobs, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
Why did the Judge Grant the Injunction? [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 1:45 pm
Homeless Charity v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
Professor Sir Robin Jacob (Speakers) and J. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:58 am
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, JD, Jacob D. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:08 am
Miller v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:05 pm
Scott Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:28 pm
” The second new case the Justices granted is a government appeal, U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
[ix] Jacob Spencer, Arbitration, Class Waivers, and Statutory Rights, 35 Harv. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:44 am
Mulhall as improvidently granted. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
Our Katonomist explains the implications of attacks on innovation.* Will a virtual body be granting the future Unitary SPCs? [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am
I am fascinated by habeas corpus cases where the federal court grants the criminal defendant a new trial, because it means the state court convicted someone and sentenced him to jail for unconstitutional reasons. [read post]
