Search for: "Jane Doe No. 14" Results 161 - 180 of 447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams-Yulee does not mark a "clear shift" in this Court's jurisprudence and does not allow for broad restrictions on judicial candidate speech [A.] [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eric Goldman
[Opinion at pp. 13-14] The claim that FX Networks was trying to capitalize on de Havilland’s fame is absurd. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
On the evening of December 14, 2014, Plaintiff John Doe, Jane Roe, and several of Doe’s friends, identified as “K.P” and “A.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
NPR considers whether it is possible to effectively protect your privacy as a Facebook user, as does Reuters. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 5:21 am
It does: "originally used in western stories and films, introducing a subsidiary plot; now chiefly humorous and in extended use. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit’s opinion does not discuss that theory, even though the district court had invoked it to certify the class. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:31 am
In the case, Jane Doe used the phone-based application Snapchat to send a revealing selfie to a boy at her school in Southern Minnesota. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
, this post and this one), and Carter Phillips/Sidley Austin have filed a terrific brief in opposition on behalf of the Respondents, in which they (among other things) carefully explain why the SG’s accusations of ethical breaches by Jane Doe’s attorneys are groundless. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm by Staycie R. Sena
” The 14-year-old female, who is being referred to as “Jane Doe” to protect her identity as she is a minor, was taking part in what she described as sexting. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Regulating the “Kidney Club” June 14, 2017  | Thomas D. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Chutkan of Washington, D.C. issued a temporary order – to remain in effect for 14 days – to permit both “Jane Roe” and “Jane Poe” to leave the detention centers where they are being held long enough to go to a clinic and receive abortions. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse” of the… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Garza, the case involving HHS’s efforts to deny a 17-year-old girl in its custody—"Jane Doe"—the right to obtain an abortion to which she was entitled under the Constitution and Texas law. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sarah Grant
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:58 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings Early analysis of the distribution of the corporate income tax relied on theoretical models and thought experiments. [read post]