Search for: "John Hart"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2020, 9:25 am
-Thanks to Danielle Kie Hart and Francine Lipman for the heads up! [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Franklin In 1980, John Hart Ely pronounced substantive due process “a contradiction in terms—sort of like ‘green pastel redness. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 7:10 am
John Hart Ely said the twin aims came from the Rules of Decision Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
John Husband, an attorney with Holland & Hart LLP in Denver, Colorado, expects Scalia to continue most of the current DOL policies and the direction the department has taken over the last couple of years. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
So it looks like John Montgomery & Co. at Ropes & Gray in Boston will be enjoying some good ol’ fashioned Rocky Mountain haute cuisine, courtesy of the fine lawyers at Holland & Hart. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:04 pm
Hart once thought) of being exempted from those standards. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
Hart. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
John Monahan , Laurens Walker and Gregory Mitchell (University of Virginia - School of Law , University of Virginia - School of Law and University of Virginia School of Law) hve posted The Limits of Social Framework Evidence on SSRN. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:12 am
By: John M. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 11:31 pm
Delivering Family Justice in the 21st Century (Edited by Mavis Maclean, John Eekelaar & Benoit Bastard, Hart Publishing, 2015) This is a wide ranging work – there are nineteen Chapters over four separate parts. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
The paper reconstructs the idea of law as a social practice in the works of John Austin, Herbert Hart and Scott Shapiro, and shows that an accurate reading of these works leads us to cast doubt on the persuasiveness of Bernal-Pulido’s proposal. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
"Take that--John Hart Ely! [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm
New from Hart: Lawyers in 21st-Century Societies, vol. 1: National Reports, edited by Richard L Abel, Ole Hammerslev, Hilary Sommerlad and Ulrike Schultz.ICYMI: John Fabian Witt on How the Republican Party Took Over the Supreme Court in the New Republic. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:55 am
Jeffrey Vogt, Janice Bellace, Lance Compa, K D Ewing, John Hendy, Klaus Lörcher, & Tonia Novitz have published The Right to Strike in International Law (Hart Publishing 2020). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
Thérèse O’Donnell (University of Strathclyde) reviews Caroline Fournet, GENOCIDE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: MISCONCEPTIONS AND CONFUSION IN FRENCH LAW AND PRACTICE (Hart Publishing, 2013). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
Specifically, the article examines the intriguing (and little known) story of how John Hart Ely’s representation-reinforcing theory of (American) constitutional interpretation was transformed into a blueprint for the design of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:45 am
," Chapter in Protecting Human Rights in the EU: Controversies and Challenges of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (Springer, Sept. 2013) [info] In the Footsteps of John Marshall: European Courts and the Expansion of Protection of Forced Migrants, Legal Studies Paper No. 350 (Brooklyn Law School, Aug. 2013) [text via SSRN]Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Legislative Developments and Judicial Activism of the European Courts (Springer, Oct. 2013)… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
Specifically, the article examines the intriguing (and little known) story of how John Hart Ely’s representation-reinforcing theory of (American) constitutional interpretation was transformed into a blueprint for the design of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:48 am
--John Henry Schlegel, University at Buffalo School of Law--Dan Ernst [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
Hart and Lon Fuller in their 1958 debate, need not displace the analytic/descriptive project of conceptual analysis of the concept of law, but, given its provenance going back at least as far as Jeremy Bentham, nor should it be dismissed from what John Austin labeled “the province of jurisprudence. [read post]
