Search for: "Johnson v. Johnson Publishing Co." Results 161 - 180 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Held, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of are that Mr Sivananthan misled or misinformed Boris Johnson, then campaigning for election as Prime Minister, causing Mr Johnson to refer in his letter to ‘deepening ties’ with Sri Lanka. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 9 June 2014, there was a trial in the case of Johnson v Steele before Dingemans J. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  In 1958 alone, five works were published under his name, and then in 1960 and 1961 he published four different books for each of those respective years. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moline and several co-authors published an article in the widely read Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
Tribune Co., 139 N.E. at 91 (affirming judgment for defendant newspaper publisher on the ground that a city cannot maintain an action for libel); City of Philadelphia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
In this five part series, originally published in the Summer 2014 edition of the Media Law Resource Center Bulletin,[1] we take an in-depth look at the native advertising phenomenon and the legal issues surrounding the practice. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Streams of consciousnessI first published this as a comment over at Liberal Conspiracy blog. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm by Bridget Crawford
Am., Inc., 971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992) (publicity rights) Johnson v. [read post]