Search for: "Johnson v. State of Md." Results 161 - 180 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Johnson, Ph.D., a research scientist in the Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment of the New York State Department of Health, wrote a letter to James Tomarken, MD, the Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:11 am by Nirav Bhatt and Bijal Vira
Senators Mike Lee (R-UT), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Ben Cardin (D-MD), along with U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Camp’s article A History of Tax Regulation Prior to the Administrative Procedure Act was cited in the following article: Brian Boyd, State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]