Search for: "Jones v. Clark" Results 161 - 180 of 278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am by Anita Davies
Lord Neuberger gave a speech at the EWI annual conference last week, focusing on the UKSC judgment Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 and the growth of an inquisitorial rather than adversarial litigation model with regard to expert witnesses. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am by Anita Davies
Lord Neuberger gave a speech at the EWI annual conference last week, focusing on the UKSC judgment Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 and the growth of an inquisitorial rather than adversarial litigation model with regard to expert witnesses. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Kernott v Jones, heard 4 May 2011. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm by Philip Thomas
Defense trial counsel were Wade Manor and Andy Clark with the Scott Sullivan law firm in Ridgeland. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
Kernott v Jones, heard 4 May 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
Kernott v Jones, heard 4 May 2011. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Becton Dickinson (Ladas & Parry) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) (WHDA) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (IP Whiteboard) BPAI invalidates Ablaise patent…again: Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. [read post]