Search for: "Jones v. Federal Communications Commission" Results 161 - 180 of 268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Lower federal courts have found no privacy expectation in a lobby or in common areas of an apartment building in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by John Dean
Lower federal courts have found no privacy expectation in a lobby or in common areas of an apartment building in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Soghoian struck out on FOIA requests submitted to the DOJ, but learned more from the Federal Communications Commission which must approve their use. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/OD6AI4 (@KevinOKeefe) Quinn Emanuel Partner Defending Samsung at Odds With Federal Judge - http://bit.ly/PsjynF (Amy Miller) Apple-Samsung Judge 'Livid' Over Document Disclosure - http://bit.ly/OwVyE6 (Charles Babcock) Apple Asks Court to Sanction Samsung - http://on.wsj.com/OwVqnW (Jessica Vascellaro, Ashby Jones) Apple v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Examiners reservation, a federal court -- circumventing San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:23 am by Erica Newland
The White House has repeatedly called for such a baseline privacy law, and CDT has long argued that we need one sooner, not later.But while we don’t have a baseline consumer privacy law, we do have the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has the power to enforce against unfair and deceptive trade practices, including those relating to privacy. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am by Kedar
Service Employees International Union Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
ProPublica reports how owners or sister companies of media organisations including NBC News, ABC News, Fox News, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Politico, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and other local TV news outlets are “lobbying against a Federal Communications Commission measure to require broadcasters to post political ad data on the internet“. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Scarlet Extended SA v SABAM Case C-70/10, 24 November 2011, concerned Scarlet’s (an internet service provider) refusal to install a system for filtering electronic communications which use file-sharing software in order to prevent any file sharing which would infringe copyright. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Against the backdrop of a contaminated community and a complicated environmental regime, provincially and federally, Canadians need a clear answer: what is actionable in the context of chemical depositions on private lands? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston provides the day-by-day list here, characterizing Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]