Search for: "Jones v. State of Alabama"
Results 161 - 180
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
Soon after Jones and Laughlin, Cecil B. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
Texas DPS (state sovereign immunity), and Biden v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
App. 1995), app. denied, 562 N.W.2d 198 (Mich. 1997).New Mexico: Jones v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
As in Alabama, the legislature used a standard somewhat different from the Restatement formulations, but the idea is the same.California: See Schroeder v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937), United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937), United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
Leading off this edition is the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
State, __ So.3d __, 2010 WL 4882026 (Mississippi Supreme Court 2010), and this is how it arose: James Newell lived in Vernon, Alabama, but worked in . . . [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am
In 2006, in Jones v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Ala. 2011) upheld provisions of the Alabama immigration law that the Ninth Circuit struck down in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
On Nov. 19, circuit judges Henry Lackey, Robert Elliott and Andrew Howorth all told the state Supreme Court they would "awate" the appointment of a special judge to take on the case, Jones v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
The alleged harassment was simply not severe or pervasive enough to be actionable (Jones v Divercare Afton Oaks). [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Alabama, 791 F.2d 1450, 1455 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 (1987) (citing Rogers, there is no per se rule against municipality suits in the Eleventh Circuit); South Macomb Disposal Authority v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Alabama’s doctrine is somewhat distinct, in that it seems to combine a tough alternative design requirement with a consumer expectation test. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:15 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
That might be because to pursue such a claim in Alabama works as a “surrender of all rights and remedies available at common law. [read post]
