Search for: "Jones v. Washington University" Results 161 - 180 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 9:45 am
RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU Law School), federal Judge G. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:34 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
Maggs Professor of Law at Duke University and a Partner in the Washington, DC, office of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, where he is a member of the Appellate Practice Group. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Washington Post discusses the matter here. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm by MBettman
Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006), and State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
Carvin of the Washington, D.C., law firm of Jones Day, for the challengers, and U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
 . cannot be held strictly liable for any alleged product defect” under Georgia statute); Jones v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
This project, that I’m also privileged to participate in, involves an Independent Commission of Experts comprised of Canadian Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie, Alex Whiting at Harvard, Anita Ramasastry at the University of Washington and others. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
From Black Power to Prison Power: The Making of Jones v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Jones, General Counsel of Strayer University on the significance of Bolling v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:38 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Dana Raigrodski (University of Washington School of Law) has posted Property, Privacy and Power: Rethinking the Fourth Amendment in the Wake ofU.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Jones, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Strayer University; formerly Chair, D.C. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This shift in Washington State, as discussed here, marked the beginning of the end. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]