Search for: "Joshua Rozenberg"
Results 161 - 180
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
Joshua Rozenberg observes: “To some extent, its hands are tied. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Lord Irvine tonight weighed in to the debate about Britain’s relationship with the European Court of Human Rights – and effectively accused the Supreme Court of having surrendered its intellectual independence, and shirked its judicial responsibility. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
Whilst in broad agreement with these conclusions, Joshua Rozenberg notes that the UK will most probably fail in its interventions to overturn the Court’s prisoner voting rights decision. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:04 pm
Joshua Rozenberg had a piece in the Guardian, “The celebrity threesome case risks undermining the law“, making the surprising suggestion that the lone dissenter, Lord Toulson, was more convincing than his four colleagues. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:34 am
” (I am sure that I will have opportunity – perhaps without the ‘Darling’ - to use the latter line) If you have the urge to read something vaguely sensible on this most ‘unusual’ of appointments – Joshua Rozenberg does the business in The Grauniad: Chris Grayling, justice secretary: non-lawyer and ‘on the up’ politician “Grayling’s main qualifications for justice minister are that he is perceived to be… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:36 am
Joshua Rozenberg makes a similar point in The Guardian. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:22 am
But broadcasters, and viewers, will only be interested in the high-profile cases” Joshua Rozenberg is on the money with a recent article in The Guardian.. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
And, as has been pointed out recently by Joshua Rozenberg, it is difficult to see how this strategy will fit in with the new, and supposedly independent, Sentencing Council, which may give judges a freer hand at deciding the sentences they hand down, leaving, in theory at least, less room to manoeuvre for the MoJ. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:03 am
Dominic Grieve told Joshua Rozenberg on yesterday’s Law in Action (listen here): We seem to be living a world where because of competing interests on newspapers, perhaps in part because of the internet, because of the fact they are competing with the blogosphere where people are publishing a great deal of material, national newspapers are keen to give as much background detail to their readers as possible at early stages of criminal investigations. (09:25) By way of… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
While on the subject of blanket bans and the Strasbourg court, Joshua Rozenberg concludes that the Strasbourg court would find France’s ban on women wearing the burqa to be a human rights violation. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:54 am
Joshua Rozenberg offered an intriguing glimpse of how judges are trained after he was allowed to attend a training day at the Judicial College, which trains all levels of the judiciary. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Inforrm, Index on Censorship ) as well as reports in the press (Nick Clegg’s piece in the Guardian, Joshua Rozenberg (also Guardian), Christopher Hope (focusing on ‘libel tourism’) in the Telegraph. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
Joshua Rozenberg applauded the appointment of a Chancery specialist and praised Lord Justice Carnwarth for the important work that he has done in reforming the tribunal system. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:18 am
Joshua Rozenberg on his Standpoint Blog has responded: Lord Phillips is, of course, right in saying that Britain should respect the human rights of immigrants. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Update 18/06/10 – Joshua Rozenberg writes in the Guardian: “But this was something of a pyrrhic victory for AP. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:47 am
Joshua Rozenberg, writing in The Law Society Gazette, has a thoughtful piece and sums up the point with the title of his article: Privacy law, not injunctions, should be on press’s agenda It is not the injunctions that the press should be attacking, nor the judges who are bound to grant them. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 12:56 am
Joshua Rozenberg, Law in Action: Spano uncut: podcast of his interview with Robert Spano, until recently President of the ECtHR, on the UK and human rights. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am
MPs’ expenses case hinges on limits of parliamentary privilege – Joshua Rozenberg: The parliamentary privilege MP expenses case will, as was predictable, end up at the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:12 am
Informm’s blog: News: Joshua Rozenberg Interviews Mr Justice Eady Here’s something you won’t believe from Neil Rose at Legal Futures: “Complaints are a law firm’s best source of market intelligence. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
” Joshua Rozenberg was scathing of the proposed changes, suggesting that “what advocates wear in court is surely not a matter for the judges, but for the professional bodies to which those advocates belong. [read post]
