Search for: "Judicial Correctional Services Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Focused judicial scrutiny has enhanced transparency into opaque legal maneuvers that support the adjudication of indemnifiable securities claims. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
., non-emergent, non-consensual calls made using “an artificial or prerecorded voice,” to all residential phone lines and certain categories of non-residential lines—including those associated with a wireless, fax, or pager service. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Royalty Board, 970 F.3d 418 (2020) Illustrates that the increased judicial skepticism of administrative lawmaking may well be coming for certain Copyright Office functions as well. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
§ 1346, which expressly defined the term “scheme or artifice to defraud to include “a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services” – in other words, reinstating honest-services doctrine to its landscape before McNally. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The hand-downs will be streamed on Supreme Court Live and will then be made available on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Sole Cleaning Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal considered the correct approach as to determining the value of non-negotiable chips for the purpose of calculating gaming duty. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand-downs will be streamed on Supreme Court Live and will then be made available on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service. [read post]
This decision will also further increase judicial scrutiny of class action settlements in the Eleventh Circuit, which is a Circuit that, since its seminal decision in Lynn’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:43 pm by Guangjian Tu
This case was thought to be of great significance by many commentators because it could open the door for enforcement of arbitral awards issued by foreign institution with seat of proceeding in China, and demonstrates the opening-up trend for foreign legal service. [1]Brentwood Industries Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
” The Court of Appeal rejected the position of both of the parties, namely that all issues in the appeal were errors of law, to be reviewed on correctness, while the SRNA pointed to s. 26 of the Act itself, which specifies that professional misconduct is a question of fact, and not law. [72] In my view, that is the correct approach. [read post]