Search for: "Judicial Watch, Inc"
Results 161 - 180
of 887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
Human Rights Watch wrote about how human rights defenders are routinely subjected to mass surveillance and why the doctrine of “parallel construction” wrongly allows governments to hide misconduct and evade judicial review of mass surveillance. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
Sept. 24, 2019) and Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
Lines, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
For example, a woman claimed a pharmacy allowed her husband to watch CCTV footage of her buying a pregnancy test kit. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
(relisted after the November 8 and 15 conferences) The post Relist Watch appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
And third, applicants have an alternative means of seeking judicial review through 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:06 pm
The practice enables the government to hide misconduct and evade judicial review of its actions. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 pm
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
County of Marin (San Rafael Rock Quarry, Inc.) [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm
Once again, there are a multitude of things worth watching in the world of D&O. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Qualcomm, Inc., No. 17-cv-00220-LHK, another case involving FRAND, SEP, and related antitrust issues. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 6:59 am
On August 6, a group of three individual plaintiffs represented by Judicial Watch, Inc. filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court against California’s Secretary of State seeking to block the provisions of SB 826, which was signed into law in September 2018 and provides that: By December 31, 2019, every publicly traded company on a major securities exchange (e.g. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:17 am
It was brought by Judicial Watch on behalf of three taxpayers. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:27 am
Kerry Earnhardt, Inc., 123 USPQ2d at 1413. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:07 am
The complaint cites US Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm
Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit with assistance from Judicial Watch, Inc., which states it is conservative but not partisan and committed to education, transparency and accountability in government. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s March 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm
Watch the event live here. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
The hearing can be watched on the European Court of Human Right’s website. [read post]