Search for: "K v C"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Should the award fair value be subtracted under Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K because it failed to vest in the current year? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:09 pm
Ao apresentar seu voto em relação ao item V da Ação Penal 470, a ministra Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha se posicionou pela condenação de Kátia Rabello, José Roberto Salgado e Vinícius Samarane e pela absolvição de Ayanna Tenório, todos ex-dirigentes do Banco Rural. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 9:41 am
As I pointed out on June 26, 2009 - the day the Board's decision was released:The amount per FTE paid for on behalf of K-12 students will more than double to $5.16 from the amount previously paid. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:38 pm
C. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
Hawran v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:18 am
Here are the materials in City of Seattle v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(vi) of Regulation S-K requires the calculation of executive compensation actually paid to include dividends or dividend equivalents paid that are not already reflected in the fair value of stock awards or included in another component of total compensation. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
Wylie II, Molly K. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:33 am
Thus, the following dollar limits will apply for 2010, each of which is the same amount as for 2009: --the limit under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals which are described in Section 402(g)(3), and which are made under 401(k) and other plans, will be $16,500; --the limit under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(i) for catch-up contributions to a plan, other than a SIMPLE 401(k) plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or a SIMPLE IRA described in Section… [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:56 pm
Special 510(k)s. [read post]
26 May 2017, 12:03 pm
By Molly K. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:41 am
The EarthGrain Co. k/n/a Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc., No. 01 C 3895, Slip Op. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Both disputants in K & K Promotions Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Doe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
K. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Schramm & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Germany v Italy Marta Carneiro, Kirsten Ketscher & Freya Semanda, Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others Sara Bengtson, Damian Gonzalez-Salzberg, Loveday Hodson & Paul Johnson, Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom Amel Alghrani, Amal Ali & Jill Marshall, Leyla Sahin v Turkey Nicola Barker, Burden v the United Kingdom Shazia… [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:12 am
John a/k/a Sir Elton Hercules John, No. 12 C 3117, Slip Op. [read post]
