Search for: "KING v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 161 - 180
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Exactly 800 years to the day after King John agreed at Runnymede to the terms of Magna Carta, the United States Supreme Court sharply divided over the meaning of the American Constitution’s implementation of what is arguably the most central provision of both the English and American documents. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 11:16 pm
United States, the challenge to the constitutionality of the ACA. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
United States or permitted by the court’s decision in Munaf v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Because the United States continues to enforce the ACA (as its own brief noted), there is still a case or controversy, as there was in Windsor v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
* * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:50 pm
Enhanced, Refundable Child Tax CreditsThe United States faces a crisis of child poverty. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
If so, how does this differ from Biglaw firms defending, say, Guantanamo Bay detainees who want to bring down the United States? [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
Thus, Justice Thomas discusses Henry VIII and the Act of Proclamations, where Parliament (for a while) delegated to the king a limited power to legislate by proclamation. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) stated that “the actions of the department have in fact impaired the First Amendment. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
At the National League of Cities’ CitiesSpeak blog, Lisa Soronen writes that, after Tuesday’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
United States, that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Even so, a motivated group of conservative justices could decide to engage in naked partisan politics in that case, which would (among other things) allow Chief Justice Roberts to rehabilitate himself in conservatives’ eyes, after his vote to uphold the ACA in the 2012 NFIB v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-11328, and Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
” Because the President’s travel ban is not “bona fide,” the court privileged cable news hits from Rudolph Giuliani and Stephen Miller over official statements of the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, to conclude that the policy was in fact animated by animus. [read post]
