Search for: "Kaufman v Kaufman" Results 161 - 180 of 611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2020, 6:51 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
The NYSESD identified these essential services as follows: (i) research and laboratory services; (ii) hospitals; (iii) walk-in-care health facilities; (iv) emergency veterinary and livestock services; (v) elder care; (vi) medical wholesale and distribution; (vii) home health care workers or aides for the elderly; (viii) doctors and emergency dentists; (ix) nursing homes, residential health care facilities, or congregate care facilities; (x) medical supplies and equipment manufacturers and… [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 12:14 pm by Michael Lowe
” For instance, felony arrests in the City of Dallas may also be prosecuted by the district attorneys’ offices for Collin County, Denton County, Kaufman County, or Rockwall County since Dallas overlaps five different county jurisdictions. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:43 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Supreme Court to Weigh In on 2015 TCPA Carve-Out for Government-Backed Debt Collection appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:28 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
January 14, 2020 –  Nancy Hendrickson, partner and co-chair of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck’s Financial Services Practice Group, is quoted in Debtwire’s coverage of the SCOTUS Ritzen Group v Jackson Masonry case. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To be sure, the limitations period for fiduciary duty claims involving fraud is six years plus two years from when a reasonable person knew or should have known about the fraud (Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 119 [1st Dept 2003], see Aozora Bank, Ltd. v Credit Suisse Group, 144 AD3d 437, 438 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To be sure, the limitations period for fiduciary duty claims involving fraud is six years plus two years from when a reasonable person knew or should have known about the fraud (Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 119 [1st Dept 2003], see Aozora Bank, Ltd. v Credit Suisse Group, 144 AD3d 437, 438 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
The Court then cited to examples: adoption of LAFCo policies permitting development outside of cities was a project (Id.) whereas the formation of a Mello-Roos district for the purposes of new school facilities was not a project as the causal connection was missing (Kaufman & Broad-South Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
The Court then cited to examples: adoption of LAFCo policies permitting development outside of cities was a project (Id.) whereas the formation of a Mello-Roos district for the purposes of new school facilities was not a project as the causal connection was missing (Kaufman & Broad-South Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s claim for breach of fiduciary duty was also properly dismissed as untimely pursuant to the applicable three-year statute of limitations because plaintiff sought only money damages and not equitable relief (see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 118 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v Davis, 198 AD2d 63,… [read post]