Search for: "Keen v. Keen" Results 161 - 180 of 1,340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2021, 3:53 am by Peter Mahler
Keene, rejected the first two arguments but accepted the third. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:00 am
  Such was the ruling of the Cheshire County Superior Court in Denron Plumbing & HVAC, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 1:38 am by CMS
   Lord Hoffman cited the intervention of trade body the BioIndustry Association in Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 as an example of a particularly effective intervention. [read post]
19 May 2021, 3:08 pm
  The panel also employs relatively harsh terminology that you sometimes -- but don't generally -- see in appellate decisions; for example, saying not only once, but twice, that certain evidence was "woefully insufficient" to establish a particular claim.Read the opinion to see if you agree, but reading between the lines, I just got the keen sense that the justices on the panel thought that the underlying organization and its lawyers were at least a little bit sleazy and… [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:36 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Kagan and her colleagues are keen to extoll the precedents established by the Warren Court. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
The introduction to the Federal Court of Australia’s opinion in Universal Music Publishing v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:27 am by Aron Laszlo (Oppenheim Legal)
EUIPO has the right to file an appeal and turn sweet into sour for the applicant, however, the CJEU has not been keen in accepting appeals in 2020 and this approach is not expected to change in 2021.] [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:09 am by Alex Joel
Jackson said in his famous concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:00 pm
  A point that's surely valid, but one that Justice Wiley is particularly keen to make. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:51 pm by admin
Practice & Integrity 1 (2019), available at DOI: 10.35122/jospi.2019.878137 [cited as Soskolne & Baur] [3]  See Watson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 11:07 am
  My keen sense is that the parties have spent -- and now will continue to spend -- infinitely more on legal fees than this thing could ever possibly be worth.But oh well. [read post]