Search for: "Kind v. Clark" Results 161 - 180 of 489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Oleske, Jr. and Robin Fretwell Wilson. 20 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1093-1458 (2017).Allan W. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
Lewis & Clark were legendary explorers and discovers. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
What kind of repeating arms were available before 1815, when the Madison-Monroe mass production innovation program began? [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by INFORRM
Non-monetary remedies are often as important, if not more, than damages, as was made clear by Tugendhat J in Clarke v Bain [2008] EWHC 2636 (QB): “Defamation actions are not primarily about recovering money damages, but about vindication of a claimant’s reputation. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am by MBettman
He’s not a teacher—he is there to perform searches, to look into all kinds of the students’ personal belongings. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:44 am by Ronald Mann
Actually, we usually give them the benefit of a kind of good faith presumption. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
During the preparation, transportation and storage of prepared foods, the organism can multiply to reach a threshold needed to cause infection. [4] The danger posed by the risk of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has prompted the USDA to declare the bacterium an adulterant in these kinds of meat products and, as a result, to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for the presence of this deadly pathogen. [7, 29] A USDA Baseline Data Collection Program done in 1994 documented Listeria contamination on… [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
 For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am by Dan Bomsztyk
In the first case of its kind in the UK, the Supreme Court must now therefore provide clear guidance on the application Article 5(3). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:13 am by Constanty Okolie
Comment The reasoning of the arbitration tribunal and the appellate courts (and indeed the dissenting opinion of Lord Clarke) shows the difficulty often had in determining where liability lies within shipping contracts. [read post]