Search for: "Kindle v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
– Andrew Logie on need for fresh business strategy for rights-owning sector (IP finance) Why everybody lost The Pirate Bay trial (TorrentFreak) Swedish anti-piracy office threatens BitTorrent trackers (TorrentFreak) Big Content seeks injunction as Pirate Bay appeals verdict (Ars Technica) Hundreds protest against Pirate Bay decision (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) Pirate Party membership surges following Pirate Bay verdict (TorrentFreak) IFPI site under attack by Pirate Bay supporters… [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 pm
(IPKat) Google – Google down to seven AdWord lawsuits – Ascentive v Google dismissed (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
Finally, in Part V we'll look at how Baby Ninths protect us at a practical level, but also what their larger lesson is. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
Tumblr: NYT v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Copyright Amazon Kindle DRM broken (Michael Geist) Do the movie studios have a strategy for the online world? [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
(IP finance) Australia Australian ISP in court for not disconnecting users: AFACT v iiNet (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) Apple picks Woolworths in trade mark dispute (Australian Trade Marks) (Trademark Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Australian man creates ‘Piracy Payback’ website to collect donations from downloaders for distribution to rightholders’ organisations (Ars Technica) Canada Amazon… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm
Send to Kindle [read post]
2 May 2013, 11:00 am
This question is very much on our minds these days after the GPS case from last term — United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:20 am
– You can also buy my book in print at Amazon.com or as an ebook for the Kindle, the Nook from Barnes and Noble or through Hyperink. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
In 1986, Bowers v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm
The case that led to the ruling, Pollock v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
Send to Kindle [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force - ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting Cinematographical Creations (1993) &… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting… [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
