Search for: "King v. Waters" Results 161 - 180 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
So holds the 9th Circuit, in today’s decision in Makah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:34 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
My eyes opened as wide as saucers, though, when I saw "Corfield v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:43 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
What made me smile this week I’ve joined the Man v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:45 pm
Has justice rolled down like waters and righteousness like a stream as Martin Luther King, Jr. hoped it would? [read post]
29 May 2017, 11:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
      Though for many centuries, the monarch was located elsewhere, Oslo does have a royal palace, Det kongelige slott, built in the 19th century, and now serving as the home of Norway’s present King Harald V and Queen Sonja. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am by John Mikhail
      Chapter VIII (“Of the King’s Revenue”) 4. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
Recently I’ve been re-reading Taylor Branch’s Pulitzer Prize-winning book “Parting the Waters: America in the King Years,” a history of the civil rights movement with a focus on the life of Martin Luther King. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was scheduled to hear argument later this month in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]