Search for: "Koh v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
As a result, the Apple v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm
On November 18, 2013 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived Apple's bid for a permanent patent injunction against Samsung's Android-based devices with respect to three multitouch software patents (rubber-banding, tap-to-zoom-and-navigate, and pinch-to-zoom API), while affirming Judge Lucy Koh's denial of injunctive relief with respect to the asserted design patents. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:53 pm
Does 1-10 (Case No. 10-cv-05022), United States District Judge for the Northern District of California Lucy H. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:06 am
In denying Apple’s bid to stop Samsung from selling its Galaxy smartphone and tablets in the United States, U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
E.g., Hill v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:24 am
The United States is one of 3 countries (the others are Iran and Pakistan) that signed on December 12, 1977, but never ratified. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:26 am
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, famous in patent circles for his antisuit injunction and FRAND determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:49 am
Samsung points to the January 2011 Federal Circuit decision in Uniloc v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
Int'l v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:53 pm
It's about nothing less than the ability of Apple and other patent holders to win permanent injunctions in the United States against direct competitors infringing some of their patents. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
The Ninth Circuit overturned a $102 million dollar judgment issued by United States District Judge Lucy H. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:12 pm
The Apple v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
Judge Lucy Koh is based in San Jose just like Judge Whyte. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992). [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:24 am
Smartphone Purchasers v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
Last week Judge Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) denied a couple of Samsung motions that would, if granted, have delayed the limited Apple v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:56 am
Published on July 2 in the forfeiture case of United States Of America v. [read post]
