Search for: "LEAF v. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 4:44 pm
One of the more famous cases on the matter, Konchar v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
It is a fig leaf for always upholding majoritarian will. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Good day for maple leaf growers? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The Court heard nine cases during the March session when Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
We’re not talking about just any loose-leaf volume here. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Geier v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:30 am
In “The Project,” Grant Woods aims to support the arts and repair a state’s image. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Clearly Food & Beverage Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:55 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that… [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:40 am
Here is a story about a Nissan Leaf used in Kingsport, TN. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
The claim that photo ID was necessary to deter or catch voter-impersonation fraud was, Judge Posner wrote, “a mere fig leaf for efforts to disenfranchise voters likely to vote for the political party that does not control the state government. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
Wayman v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Bridges v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Bridges v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 am
Such regulations survive only if they are narrowly drawn to achieve a compelling state interest. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Lawmakers’ content- or viewpoint-based intentions generally don’t invalidate facially content-neutral speech-restrictive laws, see United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:19 pm
The Administration has taken upon itself the power to “make law,” completely outside lawful processes, and often with barely a fig leaf of pretense that it’s doing so for anything but overtly political reasons. [read post]
