Search for: "LJS, Inc."
Results 161 - 171
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 5:27 am
Carter's Lennon Travelin' Tot, EMU Carter's Travelin' Tot, Carter's Travelin' Tot; 18740-UE, 18740T-UE, 18736T-LJ, 18737-LJ, 18737T-LJ, 18726-KA, 18726T-HM; "Carter's" and "Travelin' Tot" are printed on the top rail. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
LJ Int'l, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:08 pm
Su C, Brandt LJ. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
In Tom's latest work on punitive damages, which is forthcoming in Yale LJ, and is available in draft form on SSRN now, he argues that this would and should be an available option (constitutionally speaking) so long as state legislatures or courts said they were not engaged in awarding "punitive damages," which is to say, so long as language of condemnation or language of punishment is not explicitly used. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Further to this morning's earlier posts (see immediately below), the IPKat can now say a bit about the approach taken by the House of Lords to the proper test of inventive step in Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:31 am
Image Technical Services, Inc.,[1] and relied on the decision of the Third Circuit in Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:04 pm
Image Technical Services, Inc.,[1] and relied on the decision of the Third Circuit in Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:40 am
, IPBiz, Mar. 6, 2006, http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/03/ntprim-settlement-to-lead-to-patent.html (discussing a settlement of patent infringement litigation for $ 612 million between NTP, Inc. - the patent holder - and Research in Motion - maker of the Blackberry(R) - notwithstanding that the patents had been subjected to reexamination proceedings and were initially rejected therein by the Patent Office). [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 12:17 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
(BL O/043/07) 8 February 2007Canon KK (BL O/045/07) 12 February 2007Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
, 23 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 739, discusses a DIFFERENT Classen case:In Classen Immunotherapies v. [read post]
