Search for: "LOPEZ V. LOPEZ"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:19 pm
Lopez Cruz (Indiana University Bloomington - Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research) has posted Policing, Schooling and Human Capital Accumulation on SSRN. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:49 pm
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 9:02 am
Today's advance release landlord/tenant law opinion: Lopez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Thanks to Blawgletter for reporting arbitration case law updates in Oregon with an eye for the literary as follows:Striking down as unconscionable a ban on class actions in an "arbitration rider" to a loan agreement, the court in Vasquez-Lopez v.... [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:54 pm
Lopez... [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm
(Orin Kerr) At least as of this evening, with a search from the Washington, DC area (a necessary caveat):united states v. lopez united states v. carroll towing co. united states v. morrison united states v. jones united states v. comstock united states v. virginia united states v. booker united states v. nixon united states v. watson united states v. curtiss-wright export corpInteresting. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:38 am
Helpful link: Lopez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:19 pm
Yesterday, I posted an entry about Lopez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:39 am
Lopez, No. 06-10062 (2-27-07). [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
Lopez-Reyes v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 5:11 am
Lopez, No. 06-20183-01-JWL (D. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:48 pm
Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
See Gall v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
Yet, for some reason, the New York County Supreme Court didn't see it the same way.In Lopez v. [read post]
When Congress says "and" they mean "and." And that likely means safety-valve relief for quite a few.
18 Jun 2021, 5:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
If a bank account has a negative balance resulting from paying overdrafts and overdraft fees, the bank cannot apply a future direct deposit of Social Security or V.A. benefits to make up the deficit balance owed to the bank.The court analyzed Sections 407(a) and 1383(d)(1) of 42 U.S.C., which prohibit creditors from reaching Social Security or SSI benefits by levies, garnishments, or "other legal process," and decided that these sections do not allow a bank to apply a future direct deposit… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:59 pm
Lopez Ribalda v Spain Lopez concerned five employees who worked as cashiers at a supermarket chain. [read post]
