Search for: "Label v Label" Results 161 - 180 of 13,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2021, 4:15 am by Gretchen Miller
The Federal Circuit’s recent majority opinion and Chief Judge Prost’s dissenting opinion in the GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” That is, the Pot Method would still only get them to around 80% of the advertised label numbers. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am by Kurt R. Karst
  While the approval of that labeling is squarely on the shoulders of FDA, state failure-to-warn laws are used by plaintiffs to ask courts to pass judgment on the adequacy of labeling notwithstanding the fact that the scientific experts at the FDA have signed off on the labeling. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm by John W. Arden
Plaintiffs also sufficiently alleged that the USDA Process Verified label, in concert with the "Humanely Raised" label, created the impression that an unbiased third party certified Perdue’s claims. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
       A very good example of a court stepping in is the recent case of Bergstresser v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
The purchaser alleged that the class would include thousands of individuals who purchased the product throughout the United States.The February 24 opinion in Peviani v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 8:58 am by Walter Olson
[Matt Miller, PennLive; Nicholas Malfitano, Penn Record; Chandler v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 10:42 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Koblitz —Well, it’s official: The Federal Circuit decision in GSK v. [read post]