Search for: "Lady v. Smith"
Results 161 - 180
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
On 15-19 November 2021, the First Tier Tribunal heard submissions in a freedom of information request for the release of Lord and Lady Mountbatten’s papers. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:11 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
ANTOINE SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Smith, Fredrick Edwin (The First Earl of Birkenhead). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The appeal was considered by Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Roberts-Smith is suing the Age, Sydney Morning Herald and Canberra Times for defamation relating to a series of reports published in 2018 that alleged he committed war crimes. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
In her decision, Lady Smith was right to find that impartiality and fair coverage rules ‘cannot be a simple matter of giving each and every political party equal coverage’. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am
Alastair Brett’s first appearance in the law reports in the world of media law came after he attempted to read a statement in open court in the Abse v Smith libel case in October 1985. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 20 and 21 July 2022, the Master of the Rolls, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lady Justice King heard The Guardian’s appeal challenging the decision to exclude the press from the September 2021 hearing for the will of Prince Philip, where it was decided it should be sealed for 90 years. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Smith filed separate suits in 2005 in the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 10:43 am
The respondents argued that in the case of University of East London v Hinton, Lady Smith had said that although blanket agreements were prohibited, an agreement that identified “an actual or potential claim… by a generic description or a reference to the section of the statute giving rise to the claim” was lawful. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Kilmer, Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, Debra Reddin van Tuyll, Janice R. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Dyson and Brown also agreed that the inquest into the McCaughey and Grew deaths was required by the HRA, interpreted in the light of Silih, to be Article 2 compliant, the latter pointing out ([102]) that “[t]here are, we were told, 16 existing “legacy inquests” (involving 26 deaths) currently outstanding on the coroner’s books, a further six incidents (involving eight pre-2000 deaths) referred by the Attorney General to the Coroner for… [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
